Women in Plastic Surgery Innovation: A 10-Year Review of Gender Representation in Mammary Device Patents.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to pioneer in evaluating women's representation in plastic surgery innovations, focusing on mammary prosthesis devices' inventorship. Despite growing gender parity in the field, women's involvement in innovation remains underexplored. This is especially crucial, as the predominant recipients of these innovative technologies are women, urging a necessity for broader female engagement in pioneering surgical advancements. METHOD: Patents under the "A61F2/12: Mammary prostheses and implants" classification between the dates January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2020, were identified using Google Patents Advanced. Inclusion criteria included patents (not designs) in English and applications (not grants), with no litigation limitations. Data collected included ID, title, assignee (categorized as industry, academic, private, individual), inventors, and dates (priority, filing, and publication). Sex of inventors was identified with the literature validated gender API, with manual resolution of unresolved genders or with ga_accuracy scores of less than 75%. Data were analyzed using 2-tailed Student t tests, χ2 analysis, and Pearson correlation coefficient (significance set at P ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: Of the more than 130,000 plastic surgery patents in English identified between the 10-year period, 1355 were classified as A61F2/12. A total of 374 unique patents were included for analysis (841 duplicates were removed, and 140 patents were excluded because of non-English character author names). There was a significant increase in patents over the decade (from 15 in 2011 to 88 in 2020, R2 = 0.74, P < 0.05), with a decrease in number of inventors per patent (R2 = 0.12, P < 0.05). Of the 1102 total inventors, 138 were female (11.2%), with a 4-fold increase in representation over the decade (R2 = 0.58, P < 0.05), including increase in patents filed with a woman first inventor (0%-14.8%). Women were equally likely to be first 3 inventors versus middle to last inventors (12.8% vs 11.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Over a decade, mammary device innovations rose significantly. Although women inventors' representation improved, it remains disproportionate compared with women in residency/practice. Hence, interventions should aim to align inventor representation with training ratios, through institutional optimization, reducing gender segmentation, and enhancing funding opportunities.

Which Groups of Plastic Surgery Patients Are Impacted by Social Media Use? An In-Depth Review of Social Media Engagement.

BACKGROUND: Empowerment is the process by which patients gain greater control of their health through active and informed decision-making. Greater patient empowerment has been shown to be positively correlated with improved health care outcomes and experiences. It is unclear how social media affect plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) patients' health care decision-making. This study aimed to help quantify how social media sites influence levels of PRS patient empowerment. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, a modified Cyber Info-Decisional Empowerment Scale (CIDES) survey was distributed through Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) to US adults. Sociodemographic characteristics, PRS history, and social media usage data were collected. Wilcoxon signed-rank and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess for heterogeneity for categorical variables. ANOVA and t tests were used to evaluate differences in means for Likert scale-based responses. RESULTS: A total of 473 survey responses were included. The participants were grouped based on their surgical history: cosmetic [187 (39.5%)], reconstructive [107 (22.6%)], both cosmetic and reconstructive [36 (7.6%)], or non-PRS [143 (30.2%)]. There was increased empowerment depending on the online resources used. Social media use was associated with significantly greater empowerment in six of seven CIDES categories. Of the social media platforms, Facebook was associated with higher empowerment in three of seven CIDES categories. CONCLUSION: Social media use appears to have a positive impact on PRS patient empowerment, which may reflect better patient decision-making and autonomy when consulting with their plastic surgeon.

Edematous Dermal Thickening on Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Biomarker for Lymphatic Surgical Outcomes.

Background and Objectives: One of the surgical treatments for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is debulking lipectomy. The aim of this study is to investigate whether dermal thickness could be utilized as an objective indicator of post-operative changes following debulking. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of BCRL patients who underwent debulking lipectomy was conducted. MRI-based dermal thickness was measured by two separate trained readers at 16 regions of the upper extremity. Pre- and post-operative reduction in dermal thickness was compared across the affected and unaffected (control) arms for each patient. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to assess for significant change. Univariate linear regression was used to assess the relationship between dermal thickness reduction and changes to LYMPH-Q scores, L-Dex scores, and relative volume change. Results: Seventeen patients were included in our analysis. There was significant reduction in dermal thickness at 5/16 regions in the affected arm. Dermal thickness change was significantly correlated with LYMPH-Q scores, L-Dex scores, and relative volume change in 2/16 limb compartments. There was predominant dermal thickening in the dorsal compartment of the upper arm and in the ventral and ulnar compartments of the forearm. Conclusions: Dermal thickness shows promising utility in tracking post-operative debulking procedures for breast cancer-related lymphedema. Further studies with larger patient populations and a variety of imaging modalities are required to continue to develop a clinically objective and reproducible method of post-surgical lymphedema staging and monitoring.

Fluid Distribution Patterns in Early-Stage Upper Extremity Lymphedema.

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) stage 1 (early stage) upper extremity lymphedema is characterized by fluid infiltration in the subcutaneous tissues that does not exceed 50% of the extremity circumference at any level. The spatial fluid distribution in these cases has not been detailed and may be important to help determine the presence and location of compensatory lymphatic channels. The aim of this study is to determine whether there was a pattern of distribution of fluid infiltration in patients with early-stage lymphedema that could correspond to known lymphatic pathways in the upper extremity. METHODS: A retrospective review identified all patients with MRI stage 1 upper extremity lymphedema who were evaluated at a single lymphatic center. Using a standardized scoring system, a radiologist graded the severity of fluid infiltration at 18 anatomical locations. A cumulative spatial histogram was then created to map out regions where fluid accumulation occurred most and least frequently. RESULTS: Eleven patients with MRI stage 1 upper extremity lymphedema were identified between January 2017 and January 2022. The mean age was 58 years and the mean BMI was 30 m/kg2. One patient had primary lymphedema and the remaining 10 had secondary lymphedema. The forearm was affected in nine cases, and fluid infiltration was predominantly concentrated along the ulnar aspect, followed by the volar aspect, while the radial aspect was completely spared. Within the upper arm, fluid was primarily concentrated distally and posteriorly, and occasionally medially. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with early-stage lymphedema, fluid infiltration is concentrated along the ulnar forearm and the posterior distal upper arm, which aligns with the tricipital lymphatic pathway. There is also sparing of fluid accumulation along the radial forearm in these patients, suggesting a more robust lymphatic drainage along this region, possibly due to a connection to the lateral upper arm pathway.

Non-Linear Lymphatic Anatomy in Breast Cancer Patients Prior to Axillary Lymph Node Dissection: A Risk Factor For Lymphedema Development.

Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) at the time of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has become increasingly utilized for the prevention of breast cancer related lymphedema. Preoperative indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography is routinely performed prior to an ILR procedure to characterize baseline lymphatic anatomy of the upper extremity. While most patients have linear lymphatic channels visualized on ICG, representing a non-diseased state, some patients demonstrate non-linear patterns. This study aims to determine potential inciting factors that help explain why some patients have non-linear patterns, and what these patterns represent regarding the relative risk of developing postoperative breast cancer related lymphedema in this population. A retrospective review was conducted to identify breast cancer patients who underwent successful ILR with preoperative ICG at our institution from November 2017-June 2022. Among the 248 patients who were identified, 13 (5%) had preoperative non-linear lymphatic anatomy. A history of trauma or surgery of the affected limb and an increasing number of sentinel lymph nodes removed prior to ALND appeared to be risk factors for non-linear lymphatic anatomy. Furthermore, non-linear anatomy in the limb of interest was associated with an increased risk of postoperative lymphedema development. Overall, non-linear lymphatic anatomy on pre-operative ICG lymphography appears to be a risk factor for developing ipsilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema. Guided by the study's findings, when breast cancer patients present with baseline non-linear lymphatic anatomy, our institution has implemented a protocol of prophylactically prescribing compression sleeves immediately following ALND.

Quantifying radiation in the axillary bed at the site of lymphedema surgical prevention.

PURPOSE: Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) is a procedure known to reduce the risk of lymphedema in patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). However, patients who receive adjuvant radiotherapy are at increased risk of lymphedema. The aim of this study was to quantify the extent of radiation at the site of surgical prevention. METHODS: We recently began deploying clips at the site of ILR to identify the site during radiation planning. A retrospective review was performed to identify breast cancer patients who underwent ILR with clip deployment and adjuvant radiation therapy from October 2020 to April 2022. Patients were excluded if they had not completed radiotherapy. The exposure and dose of radiation received by the site was determined and recorded. RESULTS: In a cohort of 11 patients, the site fell within the radiation field in 7 patients (64%) and received a median dose of 4280 cGy. Among these 7 patients, 3 had sites located within tissue considered at risk of oncologic recurrence and the remaining 4 sites received radiation from a tangential field treating the breast or chest wall. The median dose to the ILR site for the 4 patients whose sites were outside the radiation fields was 233 cGy. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that even when the site of surgical prevention was not within the targeted radiation field during treatment planning, it remains susceptible to radiation. Strategies for limiting radiation at this site are needed.

A Prospective Study of Radiation Therapy After Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction: Analysis of the Dosimetric Implications.

PURPOSE: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and regional nodal irradiation (RNI) are the primary causes of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) is a novel surgical procedure that reduces the incidence of BCRL after ALND. The ILR anastomosis is placed in a location thought to be outside the standard radiation therapy fields to prevent radiation-induced fibrosis of the reconstructed vessels; however, there is excess risk of BCRL from RNI even after ILR. The purpose of this study was to understand the radiation dose distribution in relation to the ILR anastomosis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This prospective study included 13 patients treated with ALND/ILR from October 2020 to June 2022. A twirl clip deployed during surgery was used to identify the ILR anastomosis site during radiation treatment planning. All cases were planned using a 3D-conformal technique with opposed tangents and an obliqued supraclavicular (SCV) field. RESULTS: RNI deliberately targeted axillary Levels 1 to 3 and the SCV nodal region in 4 patients and was limited to Level 3 and SCV nodes in 9 patients. The ILR clip was located in Level 1 in 12 patients and Level 2 in 1 patient. In patients with radiation directed at only Level 3 and SCV, the ILR clip was still within the radiation field in 5 of these patients and received a median dose of 3939 cGy (range, 2025-4961 cGy). The median dose to the ILR clip was 3939 cGy (range, 139-4961 cGy) for the entire cohort. The median dose was 4275 cGy (range, 2025-4961 cGy) when the ILR clip was within any radiation field and 233 cGy (range, 139-280 cGy) when the clip was outside all fields. CONCLUSION: The ILR anastomosis was often directly irradiated with 3D-conformal techniques and received substantial radiation dose, even when the site was not deliberately targeted. Long-term analysis will help determine whether minimizing radiation dose to the anastomosis will decrease BCRL rates.

Perspectives on the Safety of Botulinum Toxin and Facial Filler Injections: A National Survey.

BACKGROUND: Although both botulinum toxin and facial filler injections are safe procedures with high efficacy and patient satisfaction, it is unclear how knowledgeable the general public is about the risks of these common cosmetic, nonsurgical procedures. The goal of this study is to assess public knowledge of the risks of botulinum toxin and facial filler injection, as well as perceived comfort with various providers delivering these injections. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was performed through Amazon Mechanical Turk regarding knowledge of the risks of botulinum toxin and facial filler injection, as well as provider and location preferences among adults 18 years and older and currently residing in the United States. RESULTS: When asked to identify potential risks of botulinum toxin injections from a list, asymmetry, bruising, and drooping of parts of the face were correctly identified by 38%, 40%, and 49% of respondents, respectively. Asymmetry, bruising, blindness, and blood vessel clotting (vascular occlusion) were identified as risks of filler injection by 40%, 51%, 18%, and 19% of respondents, respectively. In addition, plastic surgeons were the most preferred provider for botulinum toxin and facial filler injections, preferred by 43% and 48% of participants, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although most people would consider botulinum toxin or facial filler injections, the potential risks of these procedures, especially the serious risks of facial fillers, may be poorly appreciated by the general public.

Trends of Autologous Free-Flap Breast Reconstruction and Safety during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Autologous free-flap breast reconstruction (ABR) is a valuable surgical option for patients following mastectomy. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a myriad of factors that have affected access to care, hospital logistics, and postoperative outcomes. This study aims to identify differences in patient selection, hospital course and severity, and postoperative outcomes for patients who underwent ABR during and prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Patients undergoing ABR from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2019 to 2020 database were analyzed to compare sociodemographics, hospital course, and outcomes over the first postoperative month. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors predictive of complications based on the operative year. RESULTS: In total, 3,770 breast free flaps were stratified into two groups based on the timing of reconstruction (prepandemic and pandemic groups). Patients with a diagnosis of disseminated cancer were significantly less likely to undergo ABR during the COVID-19 pandemic. On univariate analysis, there were no significant differences in postoperative complications between the two groups. When controlling for potentially confounding sociodemographic and clinical risk factors, the COVID-19 group was significantly more likely to undergo reoperation compared with the prepandemic group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: When comparing outcomes for patients who underwent ABR prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic, we found a significant increase in the odds of reoperation for those who had ABR during the pandemic. Debridement procedures and exploration for postoperative hemorrhage, thrombosis, or infection increased in the prepandemic group compared to the COVID-19 group. Notably, operative times decreased.

Evaluation of Health Literacy in Plastic Surgery Using a Crowdsourced Patient Survey.

Little is known about the levels of health literacy (HL) among plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) patients compared with the general population. This study aimed to characterize HL levels in patients interested in plastic surgery and identify potential risk factors associated with inadequate levels of HL among this population. Methods: Amazon's Mechanical Turk was used to distribute a survey. The Chew's Brief Health Literacy Screener was used to evaluate the level of HL. The cohort was divided into two groups: non-PRS and PRS groups. Four subgroups were created: cosmetic, noncosmetic, reconstructive, and nonreconstructive groups. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to assess associations between levels of HL and sociodemographic characteristics. Results: A total of 510 responses were analyzed in this study. Of those, 34% of participants belong to the PRS group and 66% to the non-PRS group. Inadequate levels of HL were evidenced in 52% and 50% of the participants in the non-PRS and PRS groups, respectively (P = 0.780). No difference in HL levels was found in the noncosmetic versus cosmetic groups (P = 0.783). A statistically significant difference in HL levels was evidenced between nonreconstructive versus reconstructive groups after holding other sociodemographic factors constant (0.29, OR; 95% CI, 0.15-0.58; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Inadequate levels of HL were present in almost half of the cohort, which highlights the importance of adequately assessing HL levels in all patients. It is of utmost importance to evaluate HL in clinical practice using evidence-based criteria to better inform and educate patients interested in plastic surgery.

A CT-Derived Measurement of Sarcopenia Fails to Predict Falls.

Sarcopenia and frailty have both emerged as risk factors for elderly falls. We investigated whether radiologic sarcopenia or frailty are associated with falls in a high-risk geriatric outpatient population. We reviewed 114 patients followed at the Center for Healthy Senior Living who had undergone a computerized tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis for any reason from 2013 to 2019. Sarcopenia was determined by psoas muscle cross-sectional area at L3 on CT scan. Their individual frailty score was calculated. The primary outcome was admission to hospital for falls. There were no statistical differences in frailty score or sarcopenia between the 2 groups (left/right psoas muscle: no hospital admission = 6.8 ± 2.4/6.4 ± 2.5 vs falls requiring hospital admission 6.5 ± 2.3/6.5 ± 2.3 cm2). We concluded that neither frailty score nor sarcopenia predicted the occurrence of falls in our high-risk geriatric outpatient population.